Comments on: rel=”nofollow” http://www.fuzzuck.com/2006/06/04/relnofollow/ A random muse Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:33:48 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1 by: hvizdak http://www.fuzzuck.com/2006/06/04/relnofollow/#comment-29 Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:08:12 +0000 http://www.fuzzuck.com/2006/06/04/relnofollow/#comment-29 I would like to mention that the nofollow evil is not officially supported by w3c. What's more, Google Sitemaps shows links with nofollow value (rel is the attribute, nofollow is it's value) as ordinary links pointing to your web pages. Does this make any sense? Google claims that such links don't count, but Google's own product (or service or whatever), Sitemaps, claims something else... Weird. I would like to mention that the nofollow evil is not officially supported by w3c.

What’s more, Google Sitemaps shows links with nofollow value (rel is the attribute, nofollow is it’s value) as ordinary links pointing to your web pages. Does this make any sense? Google claims that such links don’t count, but Google’s own product (or service or whatever), Sitemaps, claims something else… Weird.

]]> by: Fuzzuck.com · Directory Ranking or Link Bait? http://www.fuzzuck.com/2006/06/04/relnofollow/#comment-5 Thu, 16 Nov 2006 23:38:49 +0000 http://www.fuzzuck.com/2006/06/04/relnofollow/#comment-5 [...] Are we participating? We have an interest in seeing how the search engines currently index and score nofollow links, so we added a nofollow listing in the Web Directories category at eWebPages Directory to see for ourselves.  [...] […] Are we participating? We have an interest in seeing how the search engines currently index and score nofollow links, so we added a nofollow listing in the Web Directories category at eWebPages Directory to see for ourselves.  […]

]]>